On Avril Lavigne’s “Hello Kitty”

(put that thing away)

I didn’t intend to write an article on Avril Lavigne’s latest video “Hello Kitty”. But, after reading AimxAim‘s fine article in Janakya MottainaiHow much of a culture are you really allowed to like?” I was inspired to write a follow-up comment. My simple comment turned into the 800 words published here. I’d like to thank AimxAim for allowing me to crosspost my comment here.

Firstly, I’m not white. I know a lot of white people are confused by the “double standard” of racism. I’d like to remind them that racism is something perpetrated by the dominant culture against the subordinate culture. Racism is the act of suppressing or subordinating cultures that are different than the dominant culture. Some people may believe this definition controversial since it means that they will never be subject to racism or (gasp) “reverse racism”. A member of the dominant culture, while he/she may be discriminated against, will never be subject to an institutionalized system that blocks their upward mobility. Racism permeates the fabric of the culture from people, to its laws, and to the portrayal of subordinate cultures in popular media.

I don’t think most white men can truly understand or empathize with the effects of a lifetime of the media images of Asian men as either asexual, effete nerds or asexual, robotic kung fu masters. So, when Avril Lavigne films a video in Tokyo, yet casts the only Japanese man in the video as a sushi chef I think we have a problem. With all of Tokyo from which to draw, the only scenario involving a Japanese man worth filming was a sushi chef? I dare Avril to film a video in Tokyo where her romantic interest is a Japanese man. I double- and triple-dare.

Think about the message this video sends to Asian women. The four Asian girls are the background dancers to the White girl, making them little more than Avril’s props and accessories. They dance so emotionlessly just behind Avril they might as well be mannequins. Perhaps it was an artistic decision to make the girls look bored and soulless, but should we allow “art” to be used as an excuse here? Real art should provoke thought and send messages. What is the message transmitted in this case? Perhaps this isolated instance can be laughed off, but what of the hundreds of images of Asian girls who are nothing more than the arm decorations of a white male protagonist?

This video does nothing to further the cause of the Japanese people who Avril claims to love. This is the real crime of “Hello Kitty”; it’s a wasted opportunity. It’s not that I believe Avril intended to make a piece of racist trash. I don’t believe Avril is racist in the outward, aggressive sense of racism. It’s likely that she doesn’t even realize that her art serves to psychologically smother the aspirations of young Asian men and women. She may not realize it because she is not Asian. When she was a young girl, she probably just needed to change the channel to see positive her role models (I know that women have few positive role models of their own; I’m not trying to downplay sexism). But, what about, Keiko Yoshida? How long does she pound the “channel up” key before she finds a strong independent Asian woman to idolize? She won’t find her idol in an Avril Lavigne video.

Through the eyes of an Asian-American male, “Hello Kitty” represents the worst kind of racism- a racism that lies deep in the subtext and seeds psychological trauma and self-hate. However, the definition of racism I’ve laid out above is also the reason why the Japanese people have a different reaction to “Hello Kitty”. In Japan, Avril is the subordinate culture. Her video isn’t viewed as racist in Japan because it does not serve to oppress their culture. It CAN’T oppress their culture. If Avril made the most horribly bigoted, slant-eyed, yellow-faced video ever filmed, it would likely be a non-issue in Japan because either (1) it would never be seen, or (2) the entire country would be united against the monstrosity (in which case I could imagine Lavigne opining “freedom of speech”).

What is “Hello Kitty”? While I think the song is disposable pop (there’s nothing wrong with disposable pop) I have no choice but to take the viewpoint of an Asian-American when assessing the video. Avril’s smattering of kaleidoscopic images is no different than the myriad offerings of Asians fulfilling their assigned stereotypes. Blinded to the plight of Asian Americans, I think Avril truly thinks “Hello Kitty” a benign piece of celluloid. While the video is much less outwardly offensive than (say) Han Lee from “2 Broke Girls” (how is this still on the air?) the implications contained therein contribute to the internalized acceptable racial roles for Asians. Even if she didn’t make the “Hello Kitty” video for Asian Americans, I think we are right to expect more from someone who ” love(s) Japanese culture” and “spend(s) half of my time in Japan”.


4 responses

  1. While I don’t agree with absolutely everything you’ve posted in this article, I do agree with nearly all of it. And I respect that they are your reactions to both the song in video coming from an Asian-American perspective. Which is a perspective that I will never be able to fully understand myself.

    I think of any race within the United States Asian-Americans probably have the toughest time. Since Asian people only make up about 10% of the population they are hardly any Asian-Americans in the media at all. And when they are it’s usually lumped into stereotypes. The same stereotypes African-Americans were subjected to for decades. (Are are still subjected to, but not at such an alarming amount as in the past.) I don’t really think any American is denying that. Well, that’s not true, probably uninformed people aren’t aware of the problem at all. But I’d like to think that people are becoming more informed of and aware of the situation. Which is only an extremely small step in the right direction.

    While the dancers in this video may be being used as props, I don’t really find it any different than when Americans of various races are used as props in Asian pop videos. Maybe that sounds a little crass, or maybe even ignorant to some. But on a global scale it’s done everywhere in the world without being addressed. That statement also doesn’t diminish, or erase, what’s being done in the US at all.

    I can see how this video is offensive to Asian-American and continues to perpetuate the stereotypes in America. But what about the stereotypes that are going on in the rest of the world? I understand that America is essentially the world’s melting pot, and is usually looked at with a fine-toothed comb. But only pointing out the things that are wrong in American media without addressing what is also equally wrong in other country’s media, isn’t right either.


  2. Pingback: Recommended Jpop♀ Reading: April 27, 2014 | Idolminded

  3. Thanks for this. It’s really great to have some more perspective on this. That probably sounds like a really trite compliment or somesuch, but it wasn’t meant to be.


  4. Amy (@AimxAim) – You say Asians do it too, which is true, but it’s still not the same. People living in Asia are still exposed to a huge amount of American media. Most movies in cinemas are still basically going to be Hollywood movies, and with it, a very American-centric view. How often do you see Asian movies and other media being shown in the US on regular broadcast TV and cinemas?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s